Exposition On What Should Be The Right Perspective To The Concept Of "The Divine Reality"

There Are Several Forms In The Manifestation Or Identification Of "Divine Beings". But the Divine Source Is Singular But Not A Person And Not A Being Somewhere At The Outpost Of Creation.

Some religious semantics may use the term "Arch Angels", which actually in Theological and Theosophical context are the same as the identification of "Gods and Goddesses " in some other religious terms. The Divine Source as the Primordial Life is not "a Being" and not "Personally Identified In Forms" rather exist as "Pure Energy" and Primordial Consciousness which had "the Will Power" and Supreme Intelligence that initiated the act of Creation. And creation emanated through phases of emanations and development.

There was "the Creative or Divine Light" which precipitated into the Beings of Light or Divine Beings, that people identified selectively as "Gods and Goddesses" to describe the unknown or supernatural features or maybe what they made up in their mind in assumed forms. The Divine Light exist for eternity in Pure Expressions though have given rise to several forms. However, the ancient expression of "Gods and Goddesses" are in certain semantic variations also known as "Arch Angels".

The term, "Most Supreme God" as differentiated from the concept of Divine Beings is not in relation to any Form, though considered Mystery is beyond the Idea of Forms, neither Masculine nor Feminine. The so called Monotheistic Religious System, even the Abrahamic derived Religions only chose one of the "Gods and Goddesses" in the Ancient Times. These singular identification of a Divine Being in a Cosmic Perception does not mean there are no other "Divine Beings" out there. There are several of them out there. Hence, due to Ego and Superiority Complex, the Hebrew Religious context felt they were exclusively worshiping the highest expression of God. But they worshiped an anthropomorphic identification of " a Deity in masculine expression". The Divine Source as "the Most Supreme God goes beyond such identification". Rather, in the real context, the Divine Source is Pure and Divine Energy with no form rather expressed in Activity and the Progressive Will which is anchored in the Power of the Divine Source is simply, Divine Love. There is actually a difference in the concept of the Divine Source and the Divine Beings. 

To me, I simply believe that the Divine Source is Pure Energy and not a being or being himself. When some talk about "the Supreme Being Concept" it is purely relative to some religious propositions. The Divine Energy as the Source had emanations, from the "Foundational Light" which manifested, "Precipitates" of the Divine Light which gave rise to several Divine Beings. The Monotheistic Path simply identified with One of them. This special opinion of mine is based on my exploration of higher mysteries and special insights I have been privileged to have had over years of my Esoteric Studies. 

The issue that made me present this essay is partly based on what I found in one of my readings of a controversial report accredited to the "the Deity associated with the Hebrew Religion" which in the Christian Bible was reported to have given a commandment, "thou shalt not kill", yet a Hebrew King Saul was commissioned to kill the people of Amelekites by that same idea of Hebrew "Deity". And when he went on that battle was unable to kill the innocent children and women. He was punished by that concept of Deity related to the Hebrew race for sparing the animals, women and children under the controversial spell of Prophet Samuel. Even the crucifixion of Jesus, the Christ for the sins of other people where as it is part of the commandments, "thou shalt not kill". What kind of god will say something like, "thou shalt not kill but will go against his commandment to approve, killing under controversial basis"? Does that signify the Idea or Principles of Divine Love?